The Meeting That Should Have Been an Email
May 23, 2026
Planning for success is normal.
Planning for failure is transformational.
When you intentionally imagine a project or decision already having failed, your brain shifts into a different mode. Research calls this prospective hindsight and it’s been shown to surface significantly more potential risks than traditional planning or simple forecasting.
Instead of assuming things will work, your brain starts identifying what could realistically go wrong:
These aren’t negative questions.
They’re preventative ones.
A premortem (a structured “imagine-it-failed” exercise) reduces overconfidence, cuts through optimism bias, and exposes blind spots that most teams never articulate out loud. Studies show people generate more reasons, and better reasons for potential failure when they imagine the failure up front compared to standard brainstorming or critique.
This is why high-performing organizations and technical teams use premortems: not because they expect failure, but because they want plans that withstand reality, not just hope.
When you rehearse the failure early, you gain the opportunity to strengthen the plan before execution tightening weak points, adding contingencies, and eliminating avoidable mistakes.
Imagine the failure first.
Then build the version of your plan that survives it.
Veinott et al., “Evaluating the Effectiveness of the PreMortem Technique” (conference paper with experimental data)
Peabody, “Improving Planning: Quantitative Evaluation of the Premortem Method” (thesis summarizing and extending premortem research)
Mitchell, Russo, Pennington, classic “prospective hindsight”
Overview of premortem vs brainstorming in project management
Cognitive-bias mitigation in aerospace risk identification