What your brain scan looks like after 6 hours of decisions
May 21, 2026
You know the meeting. 45 minutes. Eight people. The agenda says "Align on next steps." What actually happens is 40 minutes of discussion and 5 minutes of someone saying "let's take this offline."
Which means another meeting. About the same thing. Next week.
I sat through hundreds of these before I understood what was really happening. It has nothing to do with bad meeting culture. It has everything to do with decision fatigue.
The pattern is simple. Someone needs to make a decision. It's mid-afternoon. They've already made hundreds of decisions today. Their brain is running low. So instead of deciding, they do something that feels productive but is actually avoidance: they schedule a meeting.
The meeting doesn't make the decision easier. It distributes the discomfort. And because most meetings happen in the afternoon, everyone in the room is decision-fatigued too. So the group defers. Asks for more data. Circles back.
The meeting isn't the problem. The timing of the decision is the problem.
Four rules. They've cut our unnecessary meetings in half.
A 30-minute meeting doesn't cost you 30 minutes. There's the preparation, the context-switching, and the 15-20 minutes afterwards where your brain is still processing before it can refocus. A 30-minute meeting costs you an hour. Sometimes more.
Multiply that by 8 meetings a day and you start to understand why people's best ideas happen in the shower, not in conference rooms.
If you're a leader, ask one question: how many of the decisions being made in meetings today could have been made by one person, in the morning, with the right information? The answer will probably surprise you.