The Meeting That Should Have Been an Email
May 23, 2026
First principles thinking often feels uncomfortable because it removes shortcuts.
Cognitive research shows that people prefer information that is easy to process. Familiar ideas feel more fluent and are often judged as more trustworthy, even when accuracy is unchanged.
This preference for cognitive ease supports efficiency, but not always correctness.
When assumptions are challenged, thinking slows. This reflects a shift from automatic processing to more deliberate reasoning.
That friction signals cognitive conflict the moment when existing mental models no longer fit and must be updated.
Difficulty during this process isn’t a sign that something is wrong. It often indicates that assumptions are being dismantled and reorganized into a clearer structure.
Hasher L, Goldstein D, Toppino T. Frequency and the conference of referential validity. J Verbal Learn Verbal Behav. 1977. Classic “illusory truth” study: repeated statements are judged more likely true.
Brashier NM, Marsh EJ. Judging truth. Annu Rev Psychol. 2020. Review of why familiarity and fluency lead people to mistake repeated information for true, even when it is false.
Alter AL, Oppenheimer DM. Uniting the tribes of fluency to form a metacognitive nation. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2009. Review of processing fluency and how ease affects judgments of truth and confidence.
Danek AH et al. Cognitive conflict and restructuring: The neural basis of two components of insight. Hum Brain Mapp. 2019. Shows how conflict and restructuring support problem‑solving “reframing.”
Ohlsson S. Deep learning: How the mind overrides experience. Cambridge Univ Press. 2011. Theoretical account of how impasses and restructuring help escape habitual solutions in problem solving (Overview citing Ohlsson in discussion of restructuring.)