The Meeting That Should Have Been an Email
May 23, 2026
Most planning begins with an assumption:
The plan will succeed.
But the pre-mortem decision framework starts with the opposite assumption.
Instead of asking how a project will succeed, teams imagine that it has already failed and ask:
“What caused this outcome?”
This method was introduced by psychologist Gary Klein as a structured way to reveal vulnerabilities before they become real problems.
The method builds on research known as prospective hindsight.
Studies show that when people imagine an event has already happened, they generate significantly more explanations for why it occurred than when they simply predict whether it might happen.
This shift helps people surface risks that conventional planning often overlooks.
Experimental studies of pre-mortem exercises have found that the technique can:
Rather than assuming success, teams confront possible failures early.
Project-management research and organizational reports show that pre-mortem sessions can identify large numbers of potential risks quickly.
For example, analyses of government and engineering projects have found that structured pre-mortem sessions can surface dozens of potential risks during early planning stages.
By identifying vulnerabilities earlier, teams can design mitigation strategies before problems occur.
This leads to stronger contingency planning and more realistic project expectations.
When potential failure scenarios are identified early, teams can respond in several ways:
The goal is not to eliminate uncertainty completely.
Instead, the goal is to prepare for uncertainty before it appears.
In practice, this preparation often leads to more grounded confidence once teams address the issues identified during the pre-mortem.
Running a pre-mortem requires focused attention.
Participants must analyze multiple scenarios, evaluate causes, and think through possible responses.
Research on decision-making shows that complex planning tasks place substantial demands on working memory and cognitive control.
Because of this, some teams rely on structured tools or frameworks to help organize information and maintain clarity during planning sessions.
Tools like Numin are designed with this challenge in mind, aiming to support focus and structured thinking during extended decision and planning cycles.
Gary Klein, 2007 – Performing a Project Premortem (Harvard Business Review)
Mitchell, Russo & Pennington, 1989 – Prospective hindsight study (summarized in later overviews)
Russo et al., 2010-style experiment on pre-mortems vs alternatives (reported in later summaries)
EFCOG Risk Management Task Team, 2013 – “The Use of Premortem Techniques in Risk Identification and Management” (U.S. DOE projects)
Brookings Institution, 2025 – “Imagining failure to attain success: The art and science of pre-mortems”
Scheunemann et al., 2020 – “The Effect of Planning, Strategy Learning, and Working Memory Capacity on Mental Workload” (Scientific Reports)
Di Flumeri et al., 2024 – “Working Memory Workload When Making Complex Decisions” (Brain Sciences / similar)